Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log in with Windows Live Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Submit your paper to J Biol Methods today!
Photo
- - - - -

flow and immunofluoresence


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 soymilk14

soymilk14

    Enthusiast

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 81 posts
1
Neutral

Posted 14 June 2010 - 02:13 AM

can the antibody used for flow be used for immunofluorescence microscopy? I checked if there is anti-notch3 antibody for immunofluoresnce, seems i can not find one... thank you for your help

#2 Rsm

Rsm

    Post Dog

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 381 posts
8
Neutral

Posted 14 June 2010 - 02:40 AM

Usually you can use your Ab for immunofluorescence, if they work for FACS.
However, I just found 85 antibodies for Notch3, I guess one of them might be working as well.
http://www.biocompar...s.html?s=notch3

Cheers,

Minna
I got soul, but I'm not a soldier

#3 soymilk14

soymilk14

    Enthusiast

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 81 posts
1
Neutral

Posted 14 June 2010 - 04:59 AM

thank you :o i checked the biocompare site, thanks a lot. :( by the way, can i ask for the protocol on how to quantify the fluorescent intensity ? thanks again so much,

#4 Rsm

Rsm

    Post Dog

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 381 posts
8
Neutral

Posted 14 June 2010 - 10:57 PM

You're welcome...

If you use conjugated antibodies for IHC, you'll need to use secondary antibodies to visualize. The staining won't be enough otherwise. Also check the dilution, FACS Ab's are quite diluted.

For quantification I use ImageJ, a free programm.

Go FILE -> open
then ANALYZE -> TOOLS -> ROI MANAGER
click and drag on your area of interest in the pic
click ADD in ROI MANAGER
click MEASURE in ROI MANAGER
right-click in quantification: copy to clipboard
copy into excel.

Cheers,

Minna
I got soul, but I'm not a soldier

#5 smr86

smr86

    member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 27 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 18 June 2010 - 02:03 AM

Hi Minna,

I also use Image J to measure protein intensity in my stained images. I was just curious about your protocol as it seems a lot faster than the way that we use currently. For example, I always measure the intensity of the red cells, so I open the red image in image j, then split the image into grayscale and then individually draw around each cell and measure the intensity of each cell. When you do your analysis, do you select the region of interest from the coloured picture or do you split into red,green and blue channels and measure from this?

It does sound like your method may eliminate a lot of the subjectivity that we associate with densitometry.

Thanks,

smr86

#6 Rsm

Rsm

    Post Dog

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 381 posts
8
Neutral

Posted 20 June 2010 - 10:58 PM

Hi smr86,


When I open my combined image, they automatically open as single picture per color (I save and open .lsm files, maybe depends on your file extension?). However, I never convert them into greyscale, but measure directly from the red (or green) image.

Regarding the subjectivity of densitometry: I always measure the blue DNA staining from the same cell, and quantify as red signal/nuclear signal, to avoid out-of-focus effects. Well, I am interested in a nuclear protein... But anyway, it's rather easy to do in ImageJ, just add your ROI and click measure on blue and red. But you have to click manually, that's right. And that's of course subjective :P


Cheers,

Minna
I got soul, but I'm not a soldier




Home - About - Terms of Service - Privacy - Contact Us

©1999-2013 Protocol Online, All rights reserved.