• Create Account

Submit your paper to J Biol Methods today!

# PCR efficiency calculated by Linreg

3 replies to this topic

### #1 Blackeyed

Blackeyed

Enthusiast

• Active Members
• 32 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 18 May 2010 - 08:46 AM

Hey,

I use Linreg to convert my data of RT-PCR. The program calculates a PCR efficiency for each well and a average PCR effciency
for the whole run.

Now, I have new primers and I run dilutionseries to calculate the PCR efficiency.
I've trying to design new primers for a number of months now and finally have primers that work...but

the Linreg program gives a good PCR efficiency (around 97%) but when I calculate it myself I only have around 60%.

Normally the data from the program is close to my calculations so Ive checked my calculations a number of times but
I can't see the fault...

The melting curve was good, the negative controls were negative...

So I finally have primers that work, but good enough??

Can somebody help?

Enthusiast

• Active Members
• 54 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 19 May 2010 - 12:04 AM

What do you mean with "your calculation"? Is it standard curve slope?

### #3 Blackeyed

Blackeyed

Enthusiast

• Active Members
• 32 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 19 May 2010 - 12:16 AM

I plot the dilution transformed to a log to the Ct values of the dilutions. Then I calculate the slope of the line and transform it to a percentage...

Enthusiast

• Active Members
• 54 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 19 May 2010 - 12:24 PM

Yeah, that's the standard method to calculate PCR efficiency. You should believe this method more than curve-fitting methods. You probably did your dilution series wrong.
Some tips:
Vortex vigorously when diluting samples.
Use DNA carrier such as glycerol if your concentrations are low.
Ensure you are measuring Ct's for standard curve between 10 - 30 cycles. Discard results after 30c.
Have your standard curve span at least 5 logs of concentration - i.e. 10e1 to 10e6.
Run in triplicates.

I was also using various curve-fitting models and it was giving me funny values too. Although I like that approach I think it is not robust enough to give you reliable estimation of PCR efficiency. Maybe one day after it will be standardized by some large qPCR cycler manufacturer it will be better.