Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log in with Windows Live Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Submit your paper to J Biol Methods today!
- - - - -


  • Please log in to reply
1 reply to this topic

#1 Clare



  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 193 posts

Posted 04 May 2010 - 07:46 AM

Hi guys,

Just a quickie...

For my histone mod chip-chip experiments I label EQUAL amounts of DNA (ChIP and Input DNA).

A colleague of mine has just performed ChIP with an antibody for a co-activator (they want to do ChIP-seq).
Looking at the qPCR results, I would say it has not worked while they say it has (but that's another story!!).
To test the ChIP before sequencing I suggested they hybridise it to an array (much cheaper than sequencing!).
They are telling me to label 10 times less input DNA. eg: label 1000ng ChIP DNA and only 100ng input.

To me, this seems wrong. Wouldn't this just make everything enriched when you look at the array results? Isn't this just going to end up with a lot of false positives?!!

ARG. Hope someone can advise!!


#2 Mighty Mouse

Mighty Mouse


  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 124 posts

Posted 07 May 2010 - 04:53 AM

I don't have any experience with ChIP-Chip but if you are basically taking a 10% input, wouldn't you simply correct by 10% when calculating % input values prior to statistical analysis? I know for ChIP-qPCR I like to use 1% input, that way my input curves are relatively close to my sample curves, minimizing any potential confounds with primer efficiency over larger ranges. Then I just correct when I do the enrichment calculations.

Perhaps with the ChIP-Chip you need to reduce your input value otherwise you may saturate your signal and no longer be in its linear range?

Just some thoughts.

We are all artists...painting with experience on the canvas of life

Home - About - Terms of Service - Privacy - Contact Us

©1999-2013 Protocol Online, All rights reserved.