Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

- - - - -

Cloning using BamH1 and HindIII


  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

#1 anilkumar

anilkumar

    member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 5 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 14 March 2010 - 08:17 PM

I m facing problem with BamH1 and HindIII double digestion.
As my primers dont have the overhang for the digetion with BamH1 and HindIII (restriction in my primers), I subclonned it thru TA cloning (PGEM-T easy vector Promega) so that I am sure about digestion.
As the BamH1 and HindIII suppled by NEB are not suitable for double digetion despite that I have very good band (300bp my Insert) after Double digestion in NEB2 buffer.
but for expression i want to clone it into pET28a(+).
But I am unable to have colonies after ligation (I have already check my ligation with controls).
One probability which strikes me is whether pET is being digested with both enzymes or not but if it is digetsed withj only one enzyme then at least I should have colonies after ligation due to self ligation.
Is it a problem of competent cells?
Help me.

#2 lab rat

lab rat

    Why does a science forum not have pictures of mice and rats?

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 245 posts
7
Neutral

Posted 15 March 2010 - 06:05 AM

What transfection method are you using with the pET28 vector?
42..."An immutable fixed-precision number of unlimited magnitude." <a href="http://en.wikipedia....amming_language)" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia....amming_language)</a>, accessed 25June2009.

#3 anilkumar

anilkumar

    member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 5 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 21 March 2010 - 08:06 PM

View Postlab rat, on Mar 15 2010, 06:05 AM, said:

What transfection method are you using with the pET28 vector?
heat shock

#4 phage434

phage434

    Veteran

  • Global Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,808 posts
130
Excellent

Posted 22 March 2010 - 04:17 AM

Are you transforming into a cloning strain such as DH5a, or are you trying to directly transform BL21?  The transformation efficiency of the BL21 strains is very low.  In any case, your next experiment should be to quantify the transformation efficiency of your cells.  They should be at least in the 10^8 cfu/ug region.  Transform with 1 ul of serially diluted pUC19 at 10 pg/ul and get many colonies.

#5 DocFlow

DocFlow

    member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 28 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 22 March 2010 - 05:43 AM

I don't see why HindIII-BamHI digestion should be any problem because that used to be a killer combo back during my PhD. Have you tested single digestion efficiency for both enzymes in all four NEB buffers? If you linearize your empty vector with HindIII or BamHI in four different reactions and buffer 1-4 (8 reactions in total plus control without enzyme)you can easily check which buffers that works and don't.

to me is sounds like something with the transfection efficiency. Have you checked your vector to insert ratios? Run a couple of µl on a gel after ligation to check vector size. If your new vector has the correct size it got to be a transfection issue. Competent cells.....?

#6 anilkumar

anilkumar

    member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 5 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 22 March 2010 - 08:09 PM

View Postphage434, on Mar 22 2010, 05:17 AM, said:

Are you transforming into a cloning strain such as DH5a, or are you trying to directly transform BL21?  The transformation efficiency of the BL21 strains is very low.  In any case, your next experiment should be to quantify the transformation efficiency of your cells.  They should be at least in the 10^8 cfu/ug region.  Transform with 1 ul of serially diluted pUC19 at 10 pg/ul and get many colonies.

I am using DH5a competent cells.
Now I am planning to use commercially available comp cells.

#7 anilkumar

anilkumar

    member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 5 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 22 March 2010 - 08:17 PM

View PostDocFlow, on Mar 22 2010, 06:43 AM, said:

I don't see why HindIII-BamHI digestion should be any problem because that used to be a killer combo back during my PhD. Have you tested single digestion efficiency for both enzymes in all four NEB buffers? If you linearize your empty vector with HindIII or BamHI in four different reactions and buffer 1-4 (8 reactions in total plus control without enzyme)you can easily check which buffers that works and don't.

to me is sounds like something with the transfection efficiency. Have you checked your vector to insert ratios? Run a couple of µl on a gel after ligation to check vector size. If your new vector has the correct size it got to be a transfection issue. Competent cells.....?
BamH1 and HindIII give me a beautiful band of my insert at 300bp from pGEMT-easy (TA cloning)in Neb2 buffer but I am not sure of pET28a that is why now I switch over to sequential digestion for pET28a.
Waiting for the results

#8 Vini

Vini

    Veteran

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 178 posts
1
Neutral

Posted 23 March 2010 - 06:38 AM

View Postanilkumar, on Mar 23 2010, 09:47 AM, said:

View PostDocFlow, on Mar 22 2010, 06:43 AM, said:

I don't see why HindIII-BamHI digestion should be any problem because that used to be a killer combo back during my PhD. Have you tested single digestion efficiency for both enzymes in all four NEB buffers? If you linearize your empty vector with HindIII or BamHI in four different reactions and buffer 1-4 (8 reactions in total plus control without enzyme)you can easily check which buffers that works and don't.

to me is sounds like something with the transfection efficiency. Have you checked your vector to insert ratios? Run a couple of µl on a gel after ligation to check vector size. If your new vector has the correct size it got to be a transfection issue. Competent cells.....?
BamH1 and HindIII give me a beautiful band of my insert at 300bp from pGEMT-easy (TA cloning)in Neb2 buffer but I am not sure of pET28a that is why now I switch over to sequential digestion for pET28a.
Waiting for the results


i  always had to do sequential digestion for Bam/Hind..... :o neb2 doesnt work for me... :D

#9 anilkumar

anilkumar

    member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 5 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 28 March 2010 - 12:58 AM

View PostDRN, on Mar 23 2010, 06:38 AM, said:

View Postanilkumar, on Mar 23 2010, 09:47 AM, said:

View PostDocFlow, on Mar 22 2010, 06:43 AM, said:

I don't see why HindIII-BamHI digestion should be any problem because that used to be a killer combo back during my PhD. Have you tested single digestion efficiency for both enzymes in all four NEB buffers? If you linearize your empty vector with HindIII or BamHI in four different reactions and buffer 1-4 (8 reactions in total plus control without enzyme)you can easily check which buffers that works and don't.

to me is sounds like something with the transfection efficiency. Have you checked your vector to insert ratios? Run a couple of µl on a gel after ligation to check vector size. If your new vector has the correct size it got to be a transfection issue. Competent cells.....?
BamH1 and HindIII give me a beautiful band of my insert at 300bp from pGEMT-easy (TA cloning)in Neb2 buffer but I am not sure of pET28a that is why now I switch over to sequential digestion for pET28a.
Waiting for the results


i  always had to do sequential digestion for Bam/Hind..... :D neb2 doesnt work for me... :D
I do digestion in Neb2 buffer but this time i incubate for longer period  5-6hrs
then ligation 1:3 n 1:5 ratio
Finally I got my clone.
now I have to go for sequencing meanwhile I am doing digestion to check whether I have my gene or not in vector.
Thanx for your support
Have a nice Day




Home - About - Terms of Service - Privacy - Contact Us

©1999-2012 Protocol Online, All rights reserved.