Jump to content


- - - - -

GAPDH activity assay


9 replies to this topic

#1 jaknight

    member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 15 posts

Posted 09 March 2010 - 02:19 PM

Hi,

Does anyone have a protocol for a gapdh activity assay, either for purified gapdh or directly with cell lysates?

I know there is a protocol in Methods of Enzymatic Analysis by Bergmeyer, but I don't have easy access to that book.

Thanks.

#2 Denny

    Denny Is As Denny Does

  • Active Members
  • PipPip
  • 61 posts

Posted 09 March 2010 - 04:38 PM

View Postjaknight, on Mar 9 2010, 05:19 PM, said:

Hi,

Does anyone have a protocol for a gapdh activity assay, either for purified gapdh or directly with cell lysates?

I know there is a protocol in Methods of Enzymatic Analysis by Bergmeyer, but I don't have easy access to that book.

Thanks.


Try googling "GAPDH activity assay"

Here's a paper with methods and links to references in the methods used. Looks pretty quick and simple.

http://www.biochemj....7/bj3450467.htm :lol:

#3 jaknight

    member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 15 posts

Posted 09 March 2010 - 05:17 PM

Did that, and I read that paper.

They reference the Bergmeyer book, which I can't get a hold of.

That paper and others give some of the details about the protocol, but I was hoping someone might have something more detailed.

#4 Denny

    Denny Is As Denny Does

  • Active Members
  • PipPip
  • 61 posts

Posted 09 March 2010 - 05:35 PM

View Postjaknight, on Mar 9 2010, 08:17 PM, said:

Did that, and I read that paper.

They reference the Bergmeyer book, which I can't get a hold of.

That paper and others give some of the details about the protocol, but I was hoping someone might have something more detailed.


Hi jaknight,
I'm so sorry, I took a closer look at that paper, then tried to get the Bergmeyer protocol but ran into brick walls. I will let you know if I come across something more useful.

#5 Denny

    Denny Is As Denny Does

  • Active Members
  • PipPip
  • 61 posts

Posted 09 March 2010 - 06:17 PM

View PostDenny, on Mar 9 2010, 08:35 PM, said:

View Postjaknight, on Mar 9 2010, 08:17 PM, said:

Did that, and I read that paper.

They reference the Bergmeyer book, which I can't get a hold of.

That paper and others give some of the details about the protocol, but I was hoping someone might have something more detailed.


Hi jaknight,
I'm so sorry, I took a closer look at that paper, then tried to get the Bergmeyer protocol but ran into brick walls. I will let you know if I come across something more useful.


Check your PM ;)

#6 mdfenko

    an elder

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,790 posts

Posted 10 March 2010 - 10:54 AM

here is the assay as presented by worthington:

g-3-pdh.

also

i used to assay g-3-pdh many years ago and have the assay in my methods book. let me know if you want me to post the procedure.
talent does what it can
genius does what it must
i do what i get paid to do

#7 jaknight

    member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 15 posts

Posted 11 March 2010 - 06:44 PM

Thanks for the responses.

I found a detailed protocol on Sigma's website. It's available here in case anyone in the future is looking for GAPDH assays (http://www.sigmaaldr...=0&QS=ON&F=SPEC)

The worthington assay looks slightly less complicated. So I'll try that one if this is a no go.

#8 mdfenko

    an elder

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,790 posts

Posted 12 March 2010 - 06:33 AM

the protocol given by sigma is the reverse reaction.

the assay is more complex and expensive than the forward reaction.

for one thing, the reverse reaction uses nadh in the assay while the forward reaction uses nad. nadh is more expensive and less stable than nad.

for another, the reverse reaction requires linking with another enzyme. you will have to determine how to prevent that reaction from being the rate limiting step (well, it's probably already been done, hence the assay presented).

my vote is for the far less complex and less expensive and more stable forward reaction.

and, yes, i have done both.
talent does what it can
genius does what it must
i do what i get paid to do

#9 monalisa13

    member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 1 posts

Posted 26 October 2011 - 09:04 AM

I'm encountering the same issue...the protocols posted to measure GAPDH activity are based on cuvettes. And I'm running the assay on a 96 well plate. Has either Jaknight or Denny tried re-formatting on a well plate? I've been having serious issues with getting a decent curve in measuring the formed product from DL-glyceraldehyde.
Thank you, it would be a huge help~!

#10 mdfenko

    an elder

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,790 posts

Posted 28 October 2011 - 07:34 AM

you should be able to perform the assay in a plate by adjusting the scale. the problem is that the reaction is relatively rapid and you need to read immediately after starting the reaction (we used to follow the reaction by charting the change in absorbance directly from the spectrophotometer).

you could run the reaction and kill at a specific time but one product (nadh) is labile so you'll need to find a way of killing the reaction without causing decomposition.

you can prepare the d isomer from the mixture with dowex-50 (see the link in my previous post)
talent does what it can
genius does what it must
i do what i get paid to do





Home - About - Terms of Service - Privacy - Contact Us

©1999-2011 Protocol Online, All rights reserved.