Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

- - - - -

Co-IP problem


  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 joeychuk

joeychuk

    member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 3 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 26 February 2010 - 08:53 AM

I'm doing Co-IP lately to detect the interaction between two proteins, protein A is about 50kDa and protein B is about 100kDa. I first used anti-protein A in IP and then anti-B for WB. On WB, it supposed to have a 100kDa band but I detected a strong 150kDa band instead.. What's wrong with my results? I used SDS-PAGE gel and boiled the protein before loading. I use non-reducing buffer as the loading buffer. Thank you for your help!!

Joey

#2 amelia417

amelia417

    member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 12 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 26 February 2010 - 09:09 AM

View Postjoeychuk, on Feb 26 2010, 11:53 AM, said:

I'm doing Co-IP lately to detect the interaction between two proteins, protein A is about 50kDa and protein B is about 100kDa. I first used anti-protein A in IP and then anti-B for WB. On WB, it supposed to have a 100kDa band but I detected a strong 150kDa band instead.. What's wrong with my results? I used SDS-PAGE gel and boiled the protein before loading. I use non-reducing buffer as the loading buffer. Thank you for your help!!

Joey
If you're not fully reducing the interaction of A and B, you might be detecting A and B as a combined MW of 150 kDa. To prove whether or not this is true, you should in theory (assuming that the antibodies against each A and B, respectively, still can still interact with their epitope(s) with A and B are interacting) detect the 150 kDa band with the antibody against A AND with the antibody against B.

Why not try a reducing buffer in one lane and a non-reducing buffer in another lane for two otherwise identical co-IPs and see if the 150 kDa band disappears under reducing conditions and results in the 100 kDa band for anti-B?

#3 joeychuk

joeychuk

    member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 3 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 26 February 2010 - 09:43 AM

Thank you very much, amelia417! I'm actually trying the regular WB with anti-B with reducing and non-reducing buffer right now.

Another question is, is there any protein modification that would change the size of the protein on a WB blot?

#4 laurequillo

laurequillo

    The Goddamn Batman!

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 265 posts
1
Neutral

Posted 26 February 2010 - 11:34 AM

View Postjoeychuk, on Feb 26 2010, 06:43 PM, said:

Thank you very much, amelia417! I'm actually trying the regular WB with anti-B with reducing and non-reducing buffer right now.

Another question is, is there any protein modification that would change the size of the protein on a WB blot?

There are some (Sumoylation and phosphorylation for example) but not from 100 to 150kda!!  :P

are your proteins endogenous proteins or everexpressed ones?
"He must be very ignorant for he answers every question he is asked" Voltaire

"This is SPARTA!"

"I´m the goddamn batman"




Home - About - Terms of Service - Privacy - Contact Us

©1999-2012 Protocol Online, All rights reserved.