Hi, I cannot quite explain why, with the same DNA stock sample, I am getting >90% PCR efficiency in my realtime PCR runs using 2-fold dilutions of standard samples, but <80% efficiency using 10-fold dilution series.
Help!
PCR efficiency in real timePCR
Started by pop09, Feb 11 2010 11:18 AM
5 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 11 February 2010 - 11:18 AM
#2
Posted 16 February 2010 - 12:02 PM
Hi pop09,
That is indeed strange, as the dynamic range of real-time is quite large.
I suspect that the problem you're experiencing is related to the serial dilutions: if you are doing a 2-fold dilution, you are transferring 50% of your sample to the next dilution at a time, whereas with a 10-fold dilution, only 10% is being transferred. Thus mixing might be the problem.
Make sure that the tube is very well mixed (i.e. vortexed or pipetted up/down >40 times) after each transfer....
That is indeed strange, as the dynamic range of real-time is quite large.
I suspect that the problem you're experiencing is related to the serial dilutions: if you are doing a 2-fold dilution, you are transferring 50% of your sample to the next dilution at a time, whereas with a 10-fold dilution, only 10% is being transferred. Thus mixing might be the problem.
Make sure that the tube is very well mixed (i.e. vortexed or pipetted up/down >40 times) after each transfer....
#3
Posted 16 February 2010 - 10:25 PM
pop09, on Feb 12 2010, 03:18 AM, said:
Hi, I cannot quite explain why, with the same DNA stock sample, I am getting >90% PCR efficiency in my realtime PCR runs using 2-fold dilutions of standard samples, but <80% efficiency using 10-fold dilution series.
Help!
Help!
hI pop09,
Have you check on the sensitivity level of your assay as well as the saturation point of your assay?
#4
Posted 17 February 2010 - 03:55 AM
Do you use more 10-fold sample in your PCR rxn than 2-fold sample?
#5
Posted 17 February 2010 - 11:04 AM
are the two std curves over the same dilution range? If not, I assume the range of the 2-fold dilution is much smaller (like 1:100) and this is not very accurate. I have attached some literature where the difference is explained.
Attached Files
tea-test: The artist formerly known as Ned Land
#6
Posted 19 February 2010 - 09:22 PM
Hi all thank you for your comments. I will check out the article...What do the sensitivity and saturation point mean? Obviously I am a novice to this.














