Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

- - - - -

Forward and reverse primers got very different Tm


  • Please log in to reply
11 replies to this topic

#1 Curtis

Curtis

    Metaller Scientist

  • Global Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 965 posts
42
Excellent

Posted 28 December 2009 - 02:08 AM

I'm trying to amplify a gene but I have problem with designing primer for the c-terminal of it.

the gene has a low GC content near the stop codon and that is why it is making this huge gap between the Tm of the two primers.

the gene reads as:

         1 atggactcat ccagggcaat cgggctgtac tttgattctg cccttccctc cagcagccta
       61 ttagcatttc cgatcgtcct acaagacaca ggagatggga agaagcaaat caccccacaa
      121 tacaggatcc agcgtcttga ctcgtggaca gacagtaaag aggattcggt attcatcacc
      181 acctatggat tcatcttcca agttgggaat gaggaagtca ctgtcggcat gattaatgat
      241 aatcccgggc acgagttact ttcctctgca atgctttgcc taggaagtgt cccgaacgac
      301 ggtgatcttg ttgagctggc gagggcctgc ctcactatgg tggtaacttg caagaagagt
      361 gcaactaaca ctgagagaat agtcttctcg gtagtgcagg cgccccgagt gctgcaaagc
      421 tgtatggtcg tggccaatag gtactcatca gtgaatgcag tgaaccatgt gaaagcacca
      481 gagaagatcc ctgggagcgg aaccctagag tataaggtga actttgtctc tttgactgtg
      541 gtgccgagga aggatgtcta caggatccca accgcagctt tgaaaagtat ctggctcaag
      601 cctgtacaat cttgcgctca atgtcactat gattgtggag gtggacccga agagcccgtt
      661 agtcaaatcc ctttccaagt cgatagttgg atactatgca attcttttct tgcatatcgg
      721 ggtatggtcc actgtagaaa ggaagggaaa gaaagtgaca ttgaccaagc tagaggggaa
      781 gataaggaga ctcaatctat ctgtcgggct caggattgtg ctcggacctt ccgtgcttgt
      841 gaaggcgaga ggtgcacgga caaggctgtt ggcacctttc ttctcagcca gtgggacagc
      901 ctgctatcct atagcaaatg cctctcccca ggtggtaaga tactctggag tcaaactgca
      961 cacctgcgga gtgtaaaaat tgtcattcaa gcaggcaccc aacgtgctgt cgcagtgacc
     1021 gctgatcatg aggttacctc taccaagata gagaagaggc ataccattgc taaatacaac
     1081 cctttcaaaa aatag

Forward: ATG GAC TCA TCC AGG GCA  LENGTH: 18 GC CONTENT: 55.6 % MELT TEMP: 56.0 ºC

Reverse: TTT TTT GAA AGG GTT GTA    LENGTH: 18 GC CONTENT: 27.8 % MELT TEMP: 43.9 ºC

what to do?

#2 phage434

phage434

    Veteran

  • Global Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,808 posts
130
Excellent

Posted 28 December 2009 - 04:15 AM

Make the second primer longer, TTT TTT GAA AGG GTT GTA TTT AGC

#3 Curtis

Curtis

    Metaller Scientist

  • Global Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 965 posts
42
Excellent

Posted 28 December 2009 - 09:53 AM

View Postphage434, on Dec 28 2009, 04:15 AM, said:

Make the second primer longer, TTT TTT GAA AGG GTT GTA TTT AGC

ok, thank you, as I thought. I tried not to add the gene's last TAG stop codon because I'm going to clone it to a EGFP plasmid's open reading frame. I wonder if this is still considered a complete gene or not ! I can't have the ending stop codon if I want to tag the gene. I hope my boss accepts it.

#4 microgirl

microgirl

    Veteran

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 122 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 29 December 2009 - 12:44 PM

Primers are cheap - try it with those two primers using 43deg as your annealing temp. Maybe you'll get lucky and only get one band or get only a couple well-separated bands.

View PostCurtis, on Dec 28 2009, 02:08 AM, said:

I'm trying to amplify a gene but I have problem with designing primer for the c-terminal of it.

the gene has a low GC content near the stop codon and that is why it is making this huge gap between the Tm of the two primers.

the gene reads as:

         1 atggactcat ccagggcaat cgggctgtac tttgattctg cccttccctc cagcagccta
       61 ttagcatttc cgatcgtcct acaagacaca ggagatggga agaagcaaat caccccacaa
      121 tacaggatcc agcgtcttga ctcgtggaca gacagtaaag aggattcggt attcatcacc
      181 acctatggat tcatcttcca agttgggaat gaggaagtca ctgtcggcat gattaatgat
      241 aatcccgggc acgagttact ttcctctgca atgctttgcc taggaagtgt cccgaacgac
      301 ggtgatcttg ttgagctggc gagggcctgc ctcactatgg tggtaacttg caagaagagt
      361 gcaactaaca ctgagagaat agtcttctcg gtagtgcagg cgccccgagt gctgcaaagc
      421 tgtatggtcg tggccaatag gtactcatca gtgaatgcag tgaaccatgt gaaagcacca
      481 gagaagatcc ctgggagcgg aaccctagag tataaggtga actttgtctc tttgactgtg
      541 gtgccgagga aggatgtcta caggatccca accgcagctt tgaaaagtat ctggctcaag
      601 cctgtacaat cttgcgctca atgtcactat gattgtggag gtggacccga agagcccgtt
      661 agtcaaatcc ctttccaagt cgatagttgg atactatgca attcttttct tgcatatcgg
      721 ggtatggtcc actgtagaaa ggaagggaaa gaaagtgaca ttgaccaagc tagaggggaa
      781 gataaggaga ctcaatctat ctgtcgggct caggattgtg ctcggacctt ccgtgcttgt
      841 gaaggcgaga ggtgcacgga caaggctgtt ggcacctttc ttctcagcca gtgggacagc
      901 ctgctatcct atagcaaatg cctctcccca ggtggtaaga tactctggag tcaaactgca
      961 cacctgcgga gtgtaaaaat tgtcattcaa gcaggcaccc aacgtgctgt cgcagtgacc
     1021 gctgatcatg aggttacctc taccaagata gagaagaggc ataccattgc taaatacaac
     1081 cctttcaaaa aatag

Forward: ATG GAC TCA TCC AGG GCA  LENGTH: 18 GC CONTENT: 55.6 % MELT TEMP: 56.0 ºC

Reverse: TTT TTT GAA AGG GTT GTA    LENGTH: 18 GC CONTENT: 27.8 % MELT TEMP: 43.9 ºC

what to do?


#5 tea-test

tea-test

    Veteran

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 168 posts
17
Good

Posted 30 December 2009 - 12:12 AM

View PostCurtis, on Dec 28 2009, 06:53 PM, said:

ok, thank you, as I thought. I tried not to add the gene's last TAG stop codon because I'm going to clone it to a EGFP plasmid's open reading frame. I wonder if this is still considered a complete gene or not ! I can't have the ending stop codon if I want to tag the gene. I hope my boss accepts it.

Well, then is it not possible to make it longer from the other end?
tea-test: The artist formerly known as Ned Land

#6 HomeBrew

HomeBrew

    Veteran

  • Global Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 927 posts
14
Good

Posted 30 December 2009 - 05:36 AM

Given your sequence, I would do something like:


WARNING: Right primer is unacceptable: Long poly-X

OLIGO			start  len	  tm	 gc%   any	3' seq 
LEFT PRIMER		  1   20   61.66   50.00  5.00  2.00 atggactcatccagggcaat
RIGHT PRIMER	  1092   25   60.25   28.00  5.00  2.00 ttttttgaaagggttgtatttagca
SEQUENCE SIZE: 1095
INCLUDED REGION SIZE: 1095

PRODUCT SIZE: 1092, PAIR ANY COMPL: 3.00, PAIR 3' COMPL: 1.00

The string of A's at the end of your sequence is a bit of a pain, but these should work OK despite the warning thrown...

#7 Curtis

Curtis

    Metaller Scientist

  • Global Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 965 posts
42
Excellent

Posted 31 December 2009 - 07:56 PM

thank you guys,

I put the right primer at idtdna.com's calculator but it is giving me a very different Tm !


http://eu.idtdna.com...er/default.aspx

ttttttgaaagggttgtatttagca
MELT TEMP: 52.0 ºC

How come?

#8 phage434

phage434

    Veteran

  • Global Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,808 posts
130
Excellent

Posted 31 December 2009 - 09:27 PM

Because the calculations are empirical and not very good.  I pay little attention to the Tm calculations, and I think you should also.  Design primers 18-24 bp long, depending on the gc content.  Use an annealing temperature of 55 C, and things will usually work.  Try to make the 3' base a c or g.  Avoid long runs of the same base.  Avoid self priming and primer-dimers with 5' overhangs and exact matches at the 3' end.  Programs such as Primer3 work well if you have real problems.

#9 HomeBrew

HomeBrew

    Veteran

  • Global Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 927 posts
14
Good

Posted 01 January 2010 - 04:59 AM

The primers I suggested were selected by Primer3 (version 1.1.4).  I agree with phage434 -- there are many ways to calculate the Tm of primers, and all produce different results.  We have used Primer3 to select thousands of primers, usually shooting for a calculated Tm of around 60C, and using them in PCR with an annealing temp of between 56C and 58C.  We have very few problems following these methods.

#10 Curtis

Curtis

    Metaller Scientist

  • Global Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 965 posts
42
Excellent

Posted 23 January 2010 - 04:32 AM

guys,

I received the primers and I ran PCR with them. I also used controls for the target gene.

The thing is that I get a big smear above my band of 1kB.

the controls seem to be ok.

I tried reducing cDNA template, the number of cycles, elongation time etc. to reduce the smear, but it is still there after 1 week running PCR everyday.

I wanted to do PCR product purification but I decided to run all the products on gel and just cut the 1kB band.

Do you think this product would be suitable for cloning?

#11 HomeBrew

HomeBrew

    Veteran

  • Global Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 927 posts
14
Good

Posted 23 January 2010 - 06:51 AM

View PostCurtis, on Jan 23 2010, 07:32 AM, said:

Do you think this product would be suitable for cloning?

Probably -- it's tough to say without seeing the gel.  Can you post a picture of it?

Is the smear you're seeing well separated from the 1 kb band or is it contiguous with it?  How much amplification product did you get?

#12 Curtis

Curtis

    Metaller Scientist

  • Global Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 965 posts
42
Excellent

Posted 24 January 2010 - 06:41 PM

sorry for the bad quality

forward primer CTTGGAATTCACCATGGACTCATCCAGGGCAATC
Tm=60.5

Reverse primer CTTGGTCGACTTTTTTGAAAGGGTTGTATTTAGC
Tm=55.7

and I put the annealing temperature at 51

I used 26 ng, 68 ng, and 1 ug of cDNA template but all give smear

Attached Thumbnails

  • Image0005.jpg





Home - About - Terms of Service - Privacy - Contact Us

©1999-2012 Protocol Online, All rights reserved.