Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log in with Windows Live Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Submit your paper to J Biol Methods today!
Photo
- - - - -

Increasing the number of products your PCR produces


  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 Micro

Micro

    Enthusiast

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 73 posts
5
Neutral

Posted 23 November 2009 - 11:12 PM

Hi,

I have degenerative primers for a gene that occurs upto 8 times in my genome. Each copy of the gene has varying specificity to the primers resulting in the dominance of a couple of products using my current method...but I want to amplify all or at least most of the genes.

Does anyone have any suggestions for decreasing the specificity of primers?

I am considering things like:
  • Increase annealing duration
  • Decrease annealing temp.
  • Put in additives
  • Remove additives (I'm currently using DMSO)
  • Use normal Taq not HotStart Taq
  • OR (as a last resort) design two set of primers to target a smaller group of genes

Does anyone have expereince with these option working or not working, as the case maybe?

Cheers M :P

#2 Adrian K

Adrian K

    Legendary Graduate Beggar

  • Global Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 712 posts
29
Excellent

Posted 26 November 2009 - 01:40 AM

I used to have idea of amplify multiple sets of genes in one shot...however after many failure, I stick back to do it one by one or couple by couple....to kill 10 birds with one stone, i throw the same stone 10 times.

You can still try what you had consider, who knows it might work...


good luck.
Expecting the world to treat you fairly because you are a good person is like expecting the lion not to attack you because you are a vegetarian.

..."best of our knowledge, as far as we know this had never been reported before, though I can't possible read all the published journals on earth, but by perform thorough search in google, the keywords did not match any documents"...

"what doesn't kill you, makes you stronger"---Goddess Casandra reminds me to be strong

"It's all just DNA. Do it."---phage434

#3 molgen

molgen

    Veteran

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 167 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 29 November 2009 - 07:20 AM

Though the best way, in my mind, to go about this is to aligning all of the transcripts and to pick primers for the conserved regions, I can't see what good it will do you.
I think that the better science is to evaluate them separately (3'UTR for instance) and then sum them up.

Edited by molgen, 29 November 2009 - 07:20 AM.


#4 Micro

Micro

    Enthusiast

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 73 posts
5
Neutral

Posted 29 November 2009 - 02:44 PM

Thanks for the feedback.

I do agree that getting all the genes is asking a lot.... however, IF I can get primers to pick up multiple genes I'm going to be using them for T-RFLP. For this reason having 1 or 2 sets is really the only option, since the fluoresent marker cost too much to get 10 primers made up. Not to mention that I don't have the genome sequence for one of the species I'm working with, so I am throwing stones while blind folded in some cases.

But that is the fun of science, figuring these things out!

I will look into the UTR suggestion as an alternative to conserved regions, which I am currently using.

Anymore comments or suggests are more than welcome!

Cheers
M




Home - About - Terms of Service - Privacy - Contact Us

©1999-2013 Protocol Online, All rights reserved.