Jump to content


- - - - -

MeDIP control


5 replies to this topic

#1 Louie

    member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 2 posts

Posted 27 October 2009 - 02:33 PM

Hi

I really need to find a promoter region for a human housekeeping gene that would be suitable to use as an unmethylated control in a MeDIP. I have been looking through commonly used genes such as beta-actin and GAPDH but they seem to have methylated promoter regions. Not sure what is normally done in relation to this, do people just desing primers to avoid the methylated areas? I am finding this hard at the moment :lol: so any help would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks

#2 methylnick

    Veteran

  • Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 250 posts

Posted 29 October 2009 - 01:51 AM

why not an imprinted region where you expect equal enrichment of the seuqence between the non-bound to bound fractions

#3 SarahWaite

    member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 2 posts

Posted 03 November 2009 - 03:15 AM

View PostLouie, on Oct 27 2009, 10:33 PM, said:

Hi

I really need to find a promoter region for a human housekeeping gene that would be suitable to use as an unmethylated control in a MeDIP. I have been looking through commonly used genes such as beta-actin and GAPDH but they seem to have methylated promoter regions. Not sure what is normally done in relation to this, do people just desing primers to avoid the methylated areas? I am finding this hard at the moment ;) so any help would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks



Hi, Do you have a reference showing that GAPDH promoter is methylated? I am looking at methylation and I need to know if GAPDH is methylated or not.

Many Thanks

Sarah

#4 ForEpi

    Enthusiast

  • Active Members
  • PipPip
  • 26 posts

Posted 03 November 2009 - 11:14 PM

I can't give you a literature reference (currently writing up the paper) but I have analysed GAPDH and ACTB in prostate cells and they are indeed methylated. For our MeDIP validation experiments we used SELS (Selenoprotein S; pyrosequencing) which is not methylated. Relative to SELS, we obtained a 50 fold enrichment of GSTP1 methylated fragments (DNA QPCR). Be aware though that SELS is active in the inflammatory pathway and so increases expression after 5-aza or dAZA treatment. If you need primer sequences let me know.

Hope this helps.
I believe in the power of Selenium!!

#5 racingstud

    member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 5 posts

Posted 05 November 2009 - 04:58 AM

View Postmethylnick, on Oct 29 2009, 10:51 AM, said:

why not an imprinted region where you expect equal enrichment of the seuqence between the non-bound to bound fractions


Could you also just use a region of DNA where there are zero CpGs or is there to high of a risk that non-CpG methylation could be present.

#6 SarahWaite

    member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 2 posts

Posted 11 November 2009 - 12:31 AM

View PostForEpi, on Nov 4 2009, 07:14 AM, said:

I can't give you a literature reference (currently writing up the paper) but I have analysed GAPDH and ACTB in prostate cells and they are indeed methylated. For our MeDIP validation experiments we used SELS (Selenoprotein S; pyrosequencing) which is not methylated. Relative to SELS, we obtained a 50 fold enrichment of GSTP1 methylated fragments (DNA QPCR). Be aware though that SELS is active in the inflammatory pathway and so increases expression after 5-aza or dAZA treatment. If you need primer sequences let me know.

Hope this helps.



Thanks this is really helpful, could you let me know the primer sequences and also where you have located your primers - I am currently working with canine DNA and G3PDH is the canine homologue to GAPDH and so hopefully I can use the methylation pattern / location of GAPDH to infer were the methylation is in G3PDH.

Many Thanks

Sarah





Home - About - Terms of Service - Privacy - Contact Us

©1999-2011 Protocol Online, All rights reserved.