I designed few siRNA targeting a miRNA.
Northern blot shows that my siRNA degrades almost all of target miRNA.
I expected that degradation of miRNA would enhance the expression of a protein inhibited by this miRNA.
However, when I do a western blot for the protein, the expression level is very low with or without the siRNA treatment.
It seems like siRNA is lowering the miRNA amount significantly but not altering its function.
How can this be? Any suggestion on where to go from here?
0
Inhibition of miRNA doesn't enhance its target expression
Started by sihyunie, Oct 09 2009 09:25 AM
4 replies to this topic
#2
Functional Screens
-
- Active Members
-
- 118 posts
Veteran
4
Neutral
Neutral
Posted 10 October 2009 - 07:28 AM
Did you use siRNA to target miRNA precursor or "mature' miRNA?
Did you detect "mature" miRNA in the Northern blot?
Did you detect "mature" miRNA in the Northern blot?
#3
Fizban
-
- Active Members
-
- 63 posts
Enthusiast
0
Neutral
Neutral
Posted 11 October 2009 - 10:50 PM
sihyunie, on Oct 9 2009, 07:25 PM, said:
I designed few siRNA targeting a miRNA.
Northern blot shows that my siRNA degrades almost all of target miRNA.
I expected that degradation of miRNA would enhance the expression of a protein inhibited by this miRNA.
However, when I do a western blot for the protein, the expression level is very low with or without the siRNA treatment.
It seems like siRNA is lowering the miRNA amount significantly but not altering its function.
How can this be? Any suggestion on where to go from here?
Northern blot shows that my siRNA degrades almost all of target miRNA.
I expected that degradation of miRNA would enhance the expression of a protein inhibited by this miRNA.
However, when I do a western blot for the protein, the expression level is very low with or without the siRNA treatment.
It seems like siRNA is lowering the miRNA amount significantly but not altering its function.
How can this be? Any suggestion on where to go from here?
Are u sure that the protein u tested is a real target of your miRNA? I mean: is it a predicted target or a validated one?
why choosing a sirna against a miRNA? an antisense approach sound more conventional and straightforward?
I'd try overexpressing the miRNA of interest to confirm that the protein you tested as a real target and then try the antisense approach against your miRNA.
hope it helps
Fizban
#4
pcrman
-
- Global Moderators
-
- 1,029 posts
Epigenetist
46
Excellent
Excellent
Posted 12 October 2009 - 07:08 AM
Another potential problem is redundancy. Your target gene is suppressed by multiple miRNAs, knockdown one of them won't release the mRNA from repression.
#5
sihyunie
-
- Active Members
-
- 15 posts
member
0
Neutral
Neutral
Posted 12 October 2009 - 08:21 AM
Thank you all for your response.
I believe that the protein target is a real target (it was given to me by my superior), but I tried using reporter systems with miRNA binding sequence (psiCHECK and such), and that didn't work as well.
I understand that antisense is more conventional method, but for now, we are stuck with using siRNA.
Another thought is that it might be a mechanical issue. siRNA in RISC can't bind to miRNA that's already in RISC.
I don't think it's the redundancy issue since antisense against miRNA recovers the protein level.
I believe that the protein target is a real target (it was given to me by my superior), but I tried using reporter systems with miRNA binding sequence (psiCHECK and such), and that didn't work as well.
I understand that antisense is more conventional method, but for now, we are stuck with using siRNA.
Another thought is that it might be a mechanical issue. siRNA in RISC can't bind to miRNA that's already in RISC.
I don't think it's the redundancy issue since antisense against miRNA recovers the protein level.
