I have a set of populations which i have sectioned off by applying quadrants to the results. The statistics supplies me with a "percentage gated" in each quadrant and a "geometrical mean". Which is the best to use? The percentage seems so much more easier but does the geo mean add that much extra detail in any way?
0
1 reply to this topic
#2
-
- Active Members
-
- 91 posts
CellSpecific.com
Posted 13 October 2009 - 06:43 AM
It really depends on what you are asking or looking to evaluate. If you are looking to evaluate frequencies of subsets then the % gated information would be sufficient. If you would also like to evaluate the degree of expression (or absence) of a marker (or markers) on those subsets then a geometric mean analysis would come in handy.
Edited by CellSpecific.com, 13 October 2009 - 07:24 AM.
