How dangerous is EtBr?
#1
Posted 01 October 2009 - 08:45 PM
Thanks for reading this and your comments.
#2
Posted 01 October 2009 - 09:59 PM
autumnhush, on Oct 2 2009, 01:45 PM, said:
Thanks for reading this and your comments.
http://www.sigmaaldr...playMSDSPage.do
Above is a link to the MSDS (medical safety data sheets) for Ethidium bromide. If you are feeling fine then probably it is ok- Ethidium bromide powder is an irritant. It is classed as highly toxic and has been shown to be a mutagen and tetragen so its important to follow the safety advice. As a liquid its doesn't penetrate seem to penetrate too far into the skin (or remain- due to the epidermal turnover). I can not comment on inhalation and absorbence of it into the mucosal epithelia. Were you working with this outside of the fume hood or in an enclosed space? these factors will change the risk....
Personally I've never used the powdered form- we ordered pre-made solutions so I can't comment thoroughly on the risk with powdered forms.
#3
Posted 01 October 2009 - 10:11 PM
LostintheLab, on Oct 2 2009, 03:59 PM, said:
Above is a link to the MSDS (medical safety data sheets) for Ethidium bromide. If you are feeling fine then probably it is ok- Ethidium bromide powder is an irritant. It is classed as highly toxic and has been shown to be a mutagen and tetragen so its important to follow the safety advice. As a liquid its doesn't penetrate seem to penetrate too far into the skin (or remain- due to the epidermal turnover). I can not comment on inhalation and absorbence of it into the mucosal epithelia. Were you working with this outside of the fume hood or in an enclosed space? these factors will change the risk....
Personally I've never used the powdered form- we ordered pre-made solutions so I can't comment thoroughly on the risk with powdered forms.
No, I wasn't working in a fume hood or enclosed place. The EtBr solution was in a container with a lid, so I opened the lid slightly, scooped a bit of the EtBr powder and dropped it into the solution. Some of it dropped onto the benchtop though but I wiped it off quickly with 70% ethanol. Thanks for the site, I'll look it up.
#4
Posted 01 October 2009 - 11:28 PM
autumnhush, on Oct 1 2009, 08:45 PM, said:
Thanks for reading this and your comments.
The answer is not very. The LD50 of EtBr is about 1503 mg/kg for rat (oral). So you can imagine how much EtBr is required to do harm to a 50 kg researcher. Furthermore the EtBr molecule is rather large and has difficulties crossing the skin. And historically EtBr (aka hofnium) was used (For a brief period) to treat human infections of trypanosomiasis and is still used in africa to treat animals for the same. The risk of EtBr is over inflated.
All the same, you should have been working in a fumehood. While EtBr may not do you much harm, other chemicals such as SDS powder and antibiotic powder (via sensitization) can.
#5
Posted 01 October 2009 - 11:54 PM
perneseblue, on Oct 2 2009, 05:28 PM, said:
All the same, you should have been working in a fumehood. While EtBr may not do you much harm, other chemicals such as SDS powder and antibiotic powder (via sensitization) can.
Phew! It's a relief to know that, thanks! Yeah, I should've worked in a fumehood. From now on, I'd stick to the liquid EtBr.
#7
Posted 02 October 2009 - 10:57 AM
As PhD or postdoc it might be negligible as one works with this stuff for some years, and then have an office job, but a technician perhaps really works the 20-40 years with it...so I'd try to minimise the contact as far as possible.
One must presume that long and short arguments contribute to the same end. - Epicurus
...except casandra's that belong to the funniest, most interesting and imaginative (or over-imaginative?) ones, I suppose.
#8
Posted 03 October 2009 - 02:56 AM
Edited by gleb.kudr, 03 October 2009 - 02:58 AM.
#9
Posted 03 October 2009 - 05:23 AM
gleb.kudr, on Oct 3 2009, 12:56 PM, said:
But there might be a difference between chronic and acute toxicity...a reason not to underrate EtBr. Better be careful today, than to suffer later. Even if you can not diagnose the ultimate cause for the disease later.
Better safe than sorry...
One must presume that long and short arguments contribute to the same end. - Epicurus
...except casandra's that belong to the funniest, most interesting and imaginative (or over-imaginative?) ones, I suppose.
#10
Posted 05 October 2009 - 05:35 PM
hobglobin, on Oct 4 2009, 12:23 AM, said:
gleb.kudr, on Oct 3 2009, 12:56 PM, said:
But there might be a difference between chronic and acute toxicity...a reason not to underrate EtBr. Better be careful today, than to suffer later. Even if you can not diagnose the ultimate cause for the disease later.
Better safe than sorry...













