HI,
My lab used to use Shrimp Alkaline phosphatase from Roche but the product has since been discontinued. I have found another althernative: Calf Intestinal Alkaline Phosphatase from NEB. I would like to ask if is there any difference using the one from calf intestine, in terms of efficiency and methodology?
Thank you....
Alkaline phosphatase
Started by Wolfie, Sep 03 2009 10:41 PM
5 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 03 September 2009 - 10:41 PM
#2
Posted 04 September 2009 - 12:03 AM
Wolfie, on Sep 3 2009, 10:41 PM, said:
HI,
My lab used to use Shrimp Alkaline phosphatase from Roche but the product has since been discontinued. I have found another althernative: Calf Intestinal Alkaline Phosphatase from NEB. I would like to ask if is there any difference using the one from calf intestine, in terms of efficiency and methodology?
Thank you....
My lab used to use Shrimp Alkaline phosphatase from Roche but the product has since been discontinued. I have found another althernative: Calf Intestinal Alkaline Phosphatase from NEB. I would like to ask if is there any difference using the one from calf intestine, in terms of efficiency and methodology?
Thank you....
Hi,
The main difference is that CIAP cannot be heat-inactivated as SAP can, so it is a bit more cumbersome to work with. I'd recommend that you find another supplier of SAP. I'm sure someone will be selling it.
Best regards.
#3
Posted 04 September 2009 - 04:51 AM
Also, check Antarctic Phosphase, by NEB, which can be heat killed.
#4
Posted 01 March 2012 - 10:19 PM
CIAP could be heat inactivated according to the product sheet of CIAP from Roche
#6
Posted 07 March 2012 - 01:23 AM
bob1, on 02 March 2012 - 12:36 PM, said:
I ran out of SEAP control enzyme for my Reporter Genn assay. Unfortunately the SEAP component is not sold separately and the recommended replacement from sigma is back-ordered...planning to use CIAP as a control and....Wish me luck













