<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Molecular Biology Troubleshooting Forum</title>
	<description></description>
	<link>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums</link>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Help. Lentivirus. Good titer but no transduction</title>
		<link>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/24371-help-lentivirus-good-titer-but-no-transduction/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello, I am working with lentivirus particles, when I do the transfection of the viral plasmid  in Lenti-x cells I can see the fluorescence of the GFP whithout problems. I have made the titration by ELISA of the protein p24 and the titer es 1.2*10E10 with a p24 lentivirus titer of Clontech. My problem is when I transduct neurons from primary culture o cell lines like lenti-x, hek293, or NSC34( motoneuron cell line) I can&#180;t se the expression of the GFP.<br />
 <br />
Anybody can help me????????? Please I do not what can I do.]]></description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/24371-help-lentivirus-good-titer-but-no-transduction/</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DNA Shuffling</title>
		<link>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/24369-dna-shuffling/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi,<br />
<br />
I'm working since last month with a DNA shuffling strategy to improve the enzimatic activity of 1 target enzyme.<br />
<br />
I follow the original protocol developed from Stemmer in 1994, but I have many problems after Primerless PCR.<br />
<br />
I always get an amazing smear of big size. I use different dilutions of this product to performe the  second PCR but I've never got the right size band (2.300 kb).<br />
<br />
Does anybody have experience with this technique?  May you give me some advice?<br />
<br />
Thanks,<br />
RV]]></description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/24369-dna-shuffling/</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Weight of a single Lambda DNA.</title>
		<link>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/24361-weight-of-a-single-lambda-dna/</link>
		<description>Can anyone please tell me the weight of a single lambda-DNA molecule of 24000 bp?</description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/24361-weight-of-a-single-lambda-dna/</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>RBS site removed in construct. Will there be expression?</title>
		<link>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/24358-rbs-site-removed-in-construct-will-there-be-expression/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[I inserted a gene of interest into a pET32a vector downstream of the T7 promoter. However, while doing this I also removed the RBS unintentionally. I plan to express the construct in BL21 E. coli to purify the protein of interest. My question is... will there be expression of the protein despite the lack of the RBS? Will the ribosomes be able to translate the mRNA without it? I am doubtful it can, but I am certainly trying to prevent having to make a new construct.<br />
 <br />
 <br />
Thanks]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/24358-rbs-site-removed-in-construct-will-there-be-expression/</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>DEPC treatment (EDTA - AcONa)</title>
		<link>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/24354-depc-treatment-edta-acona/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Could anybody tell me if EDTA can be treated with DEPC? I've heard both theories, since it has amines but tertiary ones...<br />
And Na Acetate?<br />
 <br />
Hope you can help me!!]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/24354-depc-treatment-edta-acona/</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>plasmid extraction</title>
		<link>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/24341-plasmid-extraction/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[i used traditional method alkaline lysis to extract plasmid, but i still cant get the band when i run agarose gel electrophoresis. these what i have done: <br />
 <br />
10 ml culture cell + kanamycin overnight at 37C <br />
observe grow or not<br />
transfer into falcon tube, centrifuge 13000 rpm, at 4C, 10 min<br />
remove supernatant<br />
add 100ul alkaline lysis solution 1, mix the pellet <br />
transfer into apendorf tube<br />
put on ice<br />
add 200 ul solution 2,invert 6 times, put on ice 3-5 min<br />
add 200 ul solution 3, invert <br />
centrifuge 5 min, 4C, 13ooo rpm<br />
transfer supernatant into new tube<br />
add 5 ul RNAse, put in water bath , 10 min at 37C<br />
add phenol ,same volume with supernatant<br />
centrifuge 5 min<br />
transfer the upper layer into new tube<br />
add chloroform , centrifuge, transfer the clear solution into fresh tube (wash 3 times with chloroform)<br />
add 2 volume of alcohol 95%, centrifuge, remove supernatant<br />
add 70%alcohol , centrifuge <br />
remove supernatant, dry overnight<br />
add eluent buffer, store at  -21C]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/24341-plasmid-extraction/</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>BAC library screening using PCR</title>
		<link>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/24339-bac-library-screening-using-pcr/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<span style='color: #000000'><span style='font-family: verdana, geneva, lucida,'>Hello,</span></span><br />
 <br />
<span style='color: #000000'><span style='font-family: verdana, geneva, lucida,'>I am currently </span></span>[color=#0066FF !important]<span style='font-family: verdana, geneva, lucida,'><span class='bbc_underline'>working</span></span>[/color][color=#000000]<span style='font-family: verdana, geneva, lucida,'> on a project where we have received a BAC </span>[/color][color=#000000]<span style='font-family: verdana, geneva, lucida,'>library</span>[/color][color=#000000]<span style='font-family: verdana, geneva, lucida,'> with 100 clones pooled per well. My boss has said we will screen using PCR. We will do an initial screen with PCR, then for the wells which received a postitve reaction we will dilute then 1/96 and PCR again. We will then sequences using 454 the diluted </span>[/color][color=#0066FF !important]<span style='font-family: verdana, geneva, lucida,'><span class='bbc_underline'>positive</span></span>[/color][color=#000000]<span style='font-family: verdana, geneva, lucida,'> wells. I cannot find any material online about this, and I am not sure if my supervisor knows an exact protocol. I am slightly confused about this whole method, is there anyone who can further explain it to me or provide me with a reference on this???</span>[/color]<br />
 <br />
The only information I find is about superpooling and 3D plates etc.  We are not using this, we only have the plates of 100 clones pooled per well.<br />
 <br />
[color=#000000]<span style='font-family: verdana, geneva, lucida,'>Any input is greatly appreciated, thank you.</span>[/color]]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/24339-bac-library-screening-using-pcr/</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>ligation colonies contain empty vector..</title>
		<link>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/24336-ligation-colonies-contain-empty-vector/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey,<br />
 <br />
I was wondering if anyone had any advice! I am trying to subclone a 4.2kb insert into 5.2 vector..... I am cutting with eco and bam.. i digested and ran on a gel and purified the insert and vector from the gel. following ligation and transformation there are no positive clones.<br />
 <br />
Now, the negative control always has colonies.. I know you can only test if the vector was single cut by each enzyme separately and assume the double worked. So I had the same vector with an insert in it already and cut that with eco and bam and I could see the insert dropout. I then took the backbone of that and one would assume that this dna had to be double digested if the insert dropped out. so why is there colonies on the negative control?<br />
 <br />
Please help!!!]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/24336-ligation-colonies-contain-empty-vector/</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>cDNA or genomic DNA for over expression in Arabidopsis</title>
		<link>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/24313-cdna-or-genomic-dna-for-over-expression-in-arabidopsis/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello all,<br />
			I have to over express quite a few genes in Arabidopsis. I am planning to go ahead with cDNA of gene. But I am little worried if I will be in trouble because some genes has some regulatory sequences in introns as well. So is it safe to use genomic DNA? Anybody faced any problem by using cDNA ? Please let me know if you can help with some suggestions. Thanks in advance.....]]></description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 09:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/24313-cdna-or-genomic-dna-for-over-expression-in-arabidopsis/</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[RNA isolation- can't get pellet after isopropyl]]></title>
		<link>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/24310-rna-isolation-cant-get-pellet-after-isopropyl/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[I followed the TRIzol protocol. But I could get any pellet after adding isopropyl. And I removed most of the liquid anyway thinking that maybe I just didn't see it clearly and added 75% EtOH. Still no pellet (I vortex. Then I stopped there and just stored the whole thing into -20C . I don't know what to do next. <br />
 <br />
It was my first time doing RNA isolation. <img src='http://www.protocol-online.org/forums//public/style_emoticons/default/sad.png' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':(' />]]></description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/24310-rna-isolation-cant-get-pellet-after-isopropyl/</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Reverse Transcription PCR Problem with Primer pair</title>
		<link>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/24309-reverse-transcription-pcr-problem-with-primer-pair/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi!<br />
I started recently to study the co-transcription of some catabolic genes in a gram positive bacterium with Reverse-Transcription PCR. The primer pairs which i designed seems to work good though the bands are not very intense.<br />
Before i use the primers in RT-PCR i checked them in genomic DNA and all of them gave the desirible products.The problem is one pair which although gives one band with genomic DNA, in RT-PCR gives two bands.<br />
I note that i used RobusT RT-PCR kit for Reverse-Transcription.<br />
If anyone has an idea for what is happening, i would like to know...<br />
 <br />
Thanks!!]]></description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 20:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/24309-reverse-transcription-pcr-problem-with-primer-pair/</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>High RNase concentration interfering with PCR?</title>
		<link>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/24298-high-rnase-concentration-interfering-with-pcr/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi,<br />
<br />
I started working in a new lab last week and their protocols seem a little bit awkward to me.<br />
Referring to a DNA extraction protocol from cherry fruit flies:<br />
After they extracted and precipitated the DNA and dried it in the SpeedVac, they add TE buffer + RNase and let it dissolve over night at room temperature. I was told to add RNase A to an end concentration of 10mg/ml in the buffer. In my opinion this seems to be a little bit to high? I am afraid that it could interfere with the PCR reaction.<br />
<br />
In fact the PCR reactions did not work, I used older DNA sample they gave me and samples I isolated by myself. However, I used a lambda test kit in parallel, which worked perfectly fine. So I am thinking that either the primers (although I tried several ones) might be to old (they told me that they successfully used the same primers in the past with the same PCR program) or there is really a problem with an too high concentrated RNase.<br />
<br />
I would really appreciate it if you have some ideas for me!<br />
<br />
Best regards,<br />
Ikar]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 17:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/24298-high-rnase-concentration-interfering-with-pcr/</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>SNP and SNV</title>
		<link>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/24286-snp-and-snv/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Question: For a particular gene, which would a population contain more different alleles of, SNPs or SNVs? Why?<br />
 <br />
Hi there,<br />
I thought that SNP is a single nucleotide polymorphism - which happens among a population, whereas SNV is a single nucleotide variation among an individual. So SNP should contain more alleles... Can someone please verify the answer and if it's wrong, explain why?<br />
Thank you!]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 08:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/24286-snp-and-snv/</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>failure of PCR from yeast genomic DNA</title>
		<link>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/24279-failure-of-pcr-from-yeast-genomic-dna/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Howdy, all,<br />
 <br />
I got a problem here... Plz help...<span rel='lightbox'><img src='http://www.protocol-online.org/forums//public/style_emoticons/default/huh.png' alt='Posted Image' class='bbc_img' /></span>  <br />
I tried to delete a gene in baker's yeast by homologous recombination and need to confirm the gene replacement by PCR. I transformed yeast with the deletion cassette and a couple of candidates showed up and I picked up 6 to test for deletion.<br />
Our group always isolate genomic DNA and do PCR to test. Normally I grow cell in rich medium YPD to isolate the genomic DNA and it worked for me almost every time.<br />
But this time there is a plasmid I need to maintain so I grew candidate cells in selective minimal medium. I used 5ml overnight minimal medium culture for genomic DNA isolation (phenol/chloroform and glass beads vortex method), everything looked fine - I got some white DNA pellets and washed once with 70% ethanol and then dissolved in dd water.<br />
Then I did PCR on these obtained 6 genomic DNAs along with a positive control (WT genomic DNA isolated from YPD culture). Weird thing is, the positive control showed a nice band at right size but no any band showed up for all my 6 candidate genomic DNA!!<br />
 <br />
This is the second time I observe this problem. Last time I had the same problem but after growing cells in YPD I got successful results. But this time, as I mentioned, I need selective minimal medium to maintain a plasmid (with essential gene on it).<br />
 <br />
I was careful to make sure no phenol phase was transferred, so it should not be phenol problem. I should have isolated enough genomic DNA as I could see a good amount of DNA white pellet after ethanol precipitation.<br />
 <br />
Anybody had similar experience? Probably some Taq inhibitors were carried over (somehow not a problem for YPD culture)? If so, what is the best way to remove them?<br />
 <br />
Thanks in advance.]]></description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 19:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/24279-failure-of-pcr-from-yeast-genomic-dna/</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>troubles in DNA digestion</title>
		<link>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/24272-troubles-in-dna-digestion/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi all,<br />
I've been trying to digest pGEX-4T-1(4kb) and DNA sequence of Mycoplasma (514pb) using SalI and EcoRI for 4 weeks.. But i can find nothing after runnig an agarose gel (1%).  <br />
I know that 1U of the enzyme digest completly 1&#181;g of DNA in one hour at 37&#176;C. but I'm not able to exploit this knowledge <img src='http://www.protocol-online.org/forums//public/style_emoticons/default/sad.png' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':(' /><br />
I'm using the following protocol;<br />
 <br />
H2O                            5&#181;l<br />
OPA buffer 2x             1&#181;l<br />
DNA / pGEX                4&#181;l <br />
SalI 15U/&#181;l                  0.01&#181;l<br />
EcoRI15U/&#181;l                0.01&#181;l<br />
 <br />
I tryed diffrent times of incubation at 37&#176;C: 60; 45 and 30 minutes.<br />
I changed diifrent volumes of DNA.<br />
but i still find nothing on agarose gel <span rel='lightbox'><img src='http://www.protocol-online.org/forums//public/style_emoticons/default/dry.png' alt='Posted Image' class='bbc_img' /></span><br />
 <br />
questions are:<br />
 <br />
1- How can i know if my enzymes are ok (as they ar not new)?<br />
2- as i can't know the concentration of my plasmide neither my DNA, how can i calculate the number of unit of enzyme i'm supposed to use?<br />
 <br />
<span style='color: #282828'><span style='font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif'>3- How can i estimate the concentration of DNA after running an agarose gel?</span></span><br />
<span style='color: #282828'><span style='font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif'>                   Has anybody had the same problems or do you have an idea what i'm doing wrong ?</span></span><br />
 <br />
( in the pic of agarose gel, i put 3 &#181;l of pGEX as positif control : non digested plasmid)<br />
                     If any one can help, I'll be really grateful <span rel='lightbox'><img src='http://www.protocol-online.org/forums//public/style_emoticons/default/unsure.png' alt='Posted Image' class='bbc_img' /></span><div id='attach_wrap' class='rounded clearfix'>
	<h4>Attached thumbnail(s)</h4>
	<ul>
		
			<li class=''>
				<a class='resized_img' rel='lightbox[128285]' id='ipb-attach-url-3640-0-21735700-1328909920' href="http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/index.php?app=core&module=attach&section=attach&attach_rel_module=post&attach_id=3640" title="pg.png - Size: 7.13K, Downloads: 4"><img src="http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/uploads/monthly_02_2012/post-27622-0-27597600-1328266960_thumb.png" id='ipb-attach-img-3640-0-21735700-1328909920' style='width:44;height:100' class='attach' width="44" height="100" alt="Attached Image: pg.png" /></a>
			</li>
		
	</ul>
</div>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 11:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/24272-troubles-in-dna-digestion/</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Best plasmid for GFP + Mammalian Selection</title>
		<link>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/24270-best-plasmid-for-gfp-mammalian-selection/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey everyone,<br />
 <br />
I plan on performing a nucleofection on primary neural progenitor cells derived from IPSCs so I can label them with GFP and generate a stable line. The only vectors I have found that are compatible are for lentiviral transductions such as this one: <a href='http://www.addgene.org/browse/sequence/8617/' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='nofollow external'>http://www.addgene.org/browse/sequence/8617/</a><br />
 <br />
I plan on linearizing the GFP + puromycin region then performing the transfection. Do I need to add in PolyA signals downstream of GFP and puromycin in order to get expression to generate stable clones? Do any of you know of any other plasmids on addgene which would have GFP + a selectable marker that are not designed for lentiviral work?<br />
 <br />
Thanks]]></description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 04:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/24270-best-plasmid-for-gfp-mammalian-selection/</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Transformation /Cloning Problem</title>
		<link>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/24264-transformation-cloning-problem/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi guys!<br />
 <br />
I have been working for already a few weeks on my transformation/cloning reaction. However up till today with no results :-(<br />
 <br />
I have been trying to ligate a 1,5 kbp insert into a 8 kbp vector.<br />
 <br />
First of all I digest my vector and insert with Not1, afterwards I gel purify both.<br />
Then I dephosphorylate my vector with CIP and gel purify this again. <br />
Followed by a quick ligation (NEB) reaction with a 1:3 vector/insert ratio (5min at RT).<br />
Afterwards I transform my SURE2 cells with 1 ul of the ligation reaction (in 10ul competent cells).<br />
 <br />
My positive control gave me good results however no colonies were seen on my experimental plates....<br />
 <br />
Can somebody please help me with this?<br />
 <br />
Thanks,<br />
 <br />
Alex<br />
 <br />
PS I have the intention that I lose quite a lot of product after gel purification... However I still have enough to start up a 3:1 ligation reaction...]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 20:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/24264-transformation-cloning-problem/</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Ligation Problem</title>
		<link>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/24262-ligation-problem/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi all,<br />
 <br />
I am recently having problems in ligating an insert into a vector. My vector is a 8kbp construct and my insert about 1,5 kbp. However after dephosphorylating my vector i have no colonies at all (Using T4 dna ligase). So I switched to the quick ligase kit, and they recommend to use 50ng of the vector and a 1:3 ratio for each insert. But is 50ng enough? As my vector is quite large, I am not sure whether 50ng of vector would be sufficient for the ligation reaction...<br />
 <br />
Thanks,<br />
 <br />
Alex]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 20:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/24262-ligation-problem/</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>a robust multi-gene cloning method</title>
		<link>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/24252-a-robust-multi-gene-cloning-method/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is a  robust multi-gene cloning method developped in our lab. it is easy to use and require nothing special. The efficiency is much higher than that of restriction-ligation based methods. <a href='http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030267' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='nofollow external'>http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030267</a><br />
please return your comments.]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 07:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/24252-a-robust-multi-gene-cloning-method/</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[I've run out of ideas.... Restriction enzyme digestion]]></title>
		<link>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/24238-ive-run-out-of-ideas-restriction-enzyme-digestion/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[So after my plasmid problem... I've hit a restriction digestion problem... *sigh* If it's not one thing it's something else. Before when I was cutting my plasmids (I had to concentrate it down using the speedivac, my plasmids are in TE buffer) with BssHII, I ran it on a gel to check whether digestion was complete and found multiple smeary bands. This has never happened to me before when I've used this enzyme and for plasmids that share a similar backbone to the one I'm currently working with. I thought it was because there was too much salt concentrated in the solution from the TE causing problems so I've eluted a new batch in water and concentrated it down. Set up another reaction and it doesn't appear that BssHII is cutting... which it should. I am using the correct plasmid... so I have no idea what's going on.<br />
 <br />
Does concentrated TE cause RE cutting problems?]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 02:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/24238-ive-run-out-of-ideas-restriction-enzyme-digestion/</guid>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
