<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>BioForum Method Discussion</title>
	<description></description>
	<link>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums</link>
	<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 17:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Oxygen use in bacteria</title>
		<link>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/29325-oxygen-use-in-bacteria/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello,<br />
<br />
I used anaerobic bags to test if my bacterial isolates could grow in the absence of oxygen. There was clearly visible, hence little growth. In contrast, when incubating aerobically strong growth is observed. Thus, I would consider the bacteria as facultatively anerobic.<br />
<br />
As negative control I used <em class='bbc'>Micrococcus luteus</em> which did not show any growth.<br />
<br />
<strong class='bbc'>But:</strong> My positive control (<em class='bbc'>Staphylococcus saprophyticus</em>, facultatively anerobic) did not grow/very very little in the anaerobic bag. I am confused because I expected them to grow. I do not have a strictly anerobic bacterium. I do not have anaerobic indicator strips.<br />
<br />
The questions I would like to ask is whether this method is adequate in judging a species as facultatively anaerobic and why <em class='bbc'>S. saprophyticus </em>did not grow. I inoculated from fresh cultures on appropriate medium.<br />
<br />
Furthermore, does anybody know for which purpose oxygen is metabolized in anaerobic spp.? From this metabolization H2O2 is produced which cannot be detoxified. But why do they use oxygen?<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Thanks a lot!]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 17:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/29325-oxygen-use-in-bacteria/</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>methods to extract RNA from blood sample?</title>
		<link>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/29320-methods-to-extract-rna-from-blood-sample/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[can anybody tel the methods to extract good quality RNA from blood sample?<br />
i have tried trizol method and some company kits but didnt get good results.]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 09:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/29320-methods-to-extract-rna-from-blood-sample/</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>GHR gene location of water buffalo?</title>
		<link>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/29319-ghr-gene-location-of-water-buffalo/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<span style='color: #333333'><span style='color: #333333'><span style='font-family: Verdana, Tahoma, Arial, Calibri, Geneva, sans-serif'><span style='font-size: 12px;'><span style='background-color: rgb(246, 246, 246)'>i need to know that in bovine and water buffalo the disorders and diseases related to growth hormone receptor (GHR) or growth hormone binding protein (GHBP)?</span></span></span></span></span><br />
<span style='color: #333333'><span style='color: #333333'><span style='font-family: Verdana, Tahoma, Arial, Calibri, Geneva, sans-serif'><span style='font-size: 12px;'><span style='background-color: rgb(246, 246, 246)'>also the gene location of GHR of water buffalo with refrences.</span></span></span></span></span><br />
<span style='color: #333333'><span style='color: #333333'><span style='font-family: Verdana, Tahoma, Arial, Calibri, Geneva, sans-serif'><span style='font-size: 12px;'><span style='background-color: rgb(246, 246, 246)'>pleases can anybody help me out<strong class='bbc'>?</strong><strong class='bbc'>&#8203;</strong></span></span></span></span></span>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 09:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/29319-ghr-gene-location-of-water-buffalo/</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Western Blot - Quantifying Tumor samples from two different blots</title>
		<link>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/29318-western-blot-quantifying-tumor-samples-from-two-different-blots/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello there,<br />
<br />
I'm new here. And I have a question regarding about quantifying bands on two separate membranes.<br />
<br />
So I have a total of 13 protein lysate samples from tumors. Out of those 13, there are 7 control samples, and 6 treated samples.<br />
<br />
We only have pre-casted 10 lane gels, so I loaded those 13 samples on two separate gels.<br />
<br />
gel 1 has 3 control + 3 treated samples<br />
<br />
gel 2 has 4 control + 3 treated samples.<br />
<br />
I'd like to ultimately compare the treated samples to control.<br />
<br />
After normalizing to the loading control (alpha tubulin), how can i properly combine the numbers from each blot so that I'd have 7 data points for the control group and 6 data points from the treated group? As of now, the trend between the blots between control and treated is consistent (blot 1 and 2 - ~40% decrease of treated compare to control,) but the raw value varies from blot 1 to blot 2, so significance was not reached when entered into graph pad prism. <br />
<br />
I'm hesistant to rerun the samples on a gel with more than 13 lanes so i can run all the samples together because we have little of the lysates.<br />
<br />
Any help would be appreciated!]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 23:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/29318-western-blot-quantifying-tumor-samples-from-two-different-blots/</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>SH-SY5Y and Poly-L-Lysine</title>
		<link>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/29316-sh-sy5y-and-poly-l-lysine/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello everybody, <br />
I am having problem with neuroblastoma cell line, in particular when I seed the cells on the petri dish, most of them remain in suspension.<br />
Looking on line I see that to overcome this problem some people use poly-l-lysine but I have no idea how to use it, <br />
furthermore, sigma has many type of poly-lysine, could please someone tell me how to use it ? and which kind of poly-lysine is good in term of molecular weight ? <br />
<br />
Regards<br />
<br />
Patrizio]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 01:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/29316-sh-sy5y-and-poly-l-lysine/</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>classic cloning with restriction enzymes into empty pcDNA3.1D</title>
		<link>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/29314-classic-cloning-with-restriction-enzymes-into-empty-pcdna31d/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a construct that I want to insert into pcDNA3.1D, but I want to do it with regular cloning using restriction enzymes and not TA cloning using the TOPO sites. Whilst discussing the synthesis of my construct, one of the companies I had contacted did not recommend restriction site cloning my construct into an empty pcDNA3.1D vector because they have no experience with this and they are not sure it would work. I don't see why it wouldn't work. Does anyone have any experience with cloning using an empty pcDNA3.1D vector? Are their concerns justified?<br />
<br />
Thanks a lot!]]></description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 16:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/29314-classic-cloning-with-restriction-enzymes-into-empty-pcdna31d/</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Protein folding in different species</title>
		<link>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/29313-protein-folding-in-different-species/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi!<br />
<br />
I've overexpressed a protein in both bacteria and human cells (293T). This protein is immunomodulatory and can inhibit TNFalpha secretion of immune cells. So I designed a wildtype and also mutated form that should be expressed by both species.<br />
<br />
Now I have this curious findings:<br />
The WT protein from both bacteria and 293T is working well in-vitro (positve effect).<br />
The MUT protein from 293T cells has no effect at all (that's alright as it should serve as negative control).<br />
<br />
BUT: The MUT protein from bacteria is also able to abrogate TNFalpha secretion (which should not be the case!).<br />
<br />
I've confirmed the sequences of the vectors that have been used for transformation and they were okay. Also the isolated plasmid from bacteria carries the mutation and is fine.<br />
Furthermore the MUT protein from 293T is recognized by ELISA, but NOT the MUT protein from bacteria (although they should be the same). So I'm wondering whether the folding of the MUT protein is different in human 293T and bacterial cells?! Or what explanation would you give for this fact?<br />
<br />
I'd be grateful for some advice...<br />
Regards <img src='http://www.protocol-online.org/forums//public/style_emoticons/default/smile.png' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':)' />]]></description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 14:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/29313-protein-folding-in-different-species/</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Immunoprecipitation- Incubation time with beads</title>
		<link>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/29312-immunoprecipitation-incubation-time-with-beads/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey guys<br />
<br />
In all the protocols I see it is written to incubate the Lysate solution with the antibody overnight and then add the beads next day for an hour or so. I made a mistake and add the beads last night. They are incubated with AB and sample all over the night. Is it going&nbsp;&nbsp;to be a problem? Am I going to have a huge background? should I increase the wash? I pre-cleared the sample with Rabbit serum and beads before.<br />
<br />
Please help me<br />
Thanks]]></description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 13:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/29312-immunoprecipitation-incubation-time-with-beads/</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>experiments related to epigenetics</title>
		<link>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/29311-experiments-related-to-epigenetics/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[I wanted to take a minute and say&nbsp;&nbsp;I am new to trying anything with Epigenetics, other than reading about the field and reading research papers.&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />
At the moment I have a BS degree and would like to perhaps pursue more education in the future studying Epigenetics, specifically gene expression resulting in chronic low dose exposure to environmental elements. Its been an interest for years, after hanging out with many chemophobic individuals, and studying toxicology while pursuing my degree. <br />
However, I have NO LAB SKILLS.&nbsp;&nbsp;I have read more protocols than I can count but have no idea where to get started.&nbsp;&nbsp;I was going to start with simple yeast and perhaps get my hands on some that has been modified and go from there. However other than culture techniques and extractions I am clueless after that point.&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />
If you guys have any general experiments I can run to gain some skills please share them.<br />
<br />
Thanks.]]></description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 13:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/29311-experiments-related-to-epigenetics/</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Debris in cell culture</title>
		<link>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/29310-debris-in-cell-culture/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi everyone!! Recently at my lab, cells in culture (hMSCs form Lonza) have shown to have little black dots which we have described like Cell Debris (we have been reading this forum to come to this idea). My question is if these debris may signal a hidden problem. Cells seem to be OK (no death, no contamination, no Mycoplasm ...) but i'm worried about if they may start behaving differently. Do you know if debris are a sign of any problem?<br />
<br />
Thanks to everyone!<br />
<br />
-Lara-]]></description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 13:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/29310-debris-in-cell-culture/</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>What housekeeper to use with HEK cells?</title>
		<link>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/29308-what-housekeeper-to-use-with-hek-cells/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello everybody,<br />
<br />
I am working with HEK293 cells and tried to check my RNA integration by using usual housekeepers (EF-1a, GAPDH, SDHD) but apparently they are not able to bind to this template, although in silico analyses revealed that they should. I tried them with quantitative PCR as well as with conventional RT-PCR with the same results.<br />
<br />
I would be really happy for any suggestions.<br />
<br />
Thanks a lot,<br />
<br />
Best<br />
Stephanie]]></description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 11:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/29308-what-housekeeper-to-use-with-hek-cells/</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Housekeeper for HEK cells?</title>
		<link>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/29307-housekeeper-for-hek-cells/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello everybody,<br />
<br />
I am working with HEK293 cells and tried to check my RNA integration by using usual housekeepers (EF-1a, GAPDH, SDHD) but apparently they are not able to bind to this template, although in silico analyses revealed that they should. I tried them with quantitative PCR as well as with conventional RT-PCR with the same results.<br />
<br />
I would be really happy for any suggestions.<br />
<br />
Thanks a lot,<br />
<br />
Best<br />
Stephanie]]></description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 11:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/29307-housekeeper-for-hek-cells/</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Desalting resin</title>
		<link>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/29306-desalting-resin/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[we have sephadex g-25, sephadex g-50 and sephadex g-75 resins. our protein is 20 Kda and we would like to desalt it for further processing. Can some one recommend which of these will be suitable. i.e which will cause less dilution and better desalting.<br />
<br />
we would be packing them in XK 16/40 column and use for desalting so what amount of sample can be desalted at a time.<br />
<br />
kindly suggest<br />
<br />
thanks<br />
<br />
<span rel='lightbox'><img src='http://www.protocol-online.org/forums//public/style_emoticons/default/unsure.png' alt='Posted Image' class='bbc_img' /></span>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 11:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/29306-desalting-resin/</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>desalting resin</title>
		<link>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/29305-desalting-resin/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[we have sephadex g-25, sephadex g-50 and sephadex g-75 resins. our protein is 20 Kda and we would like to desalt it for further processing. Can some one recommend which of these will be suitable. i.e which will cause less dilution and better desalting.<br />
<br />
we would be packing them in XK 16/40 column and use for desalting so what amount of sample can be desalted at a time.<br />
<br />
kindly suggest<br />
<br />
thanks]]></description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 11:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/29305-desalting-resin/</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Negative control antibodies (Anti-mouse C5 Clone BB5.1)</title>
		<link>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/29303-negative-control-antibodies-anti-mouse-c5-clone-bb51/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Had a real quick question pertaining to the primary antibody Anti-mouse C5 Clone BB5. <br />
<br />
Can I use the negative control Biotinylated Anti-Mouse IgG1(raised in horse against mouse) antibody as a negative control?<br />
<br />
Many thanks]]></description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 05:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/29303-negative-control-antibodies-anti-mouse-c5-clone-bb51/</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Type I Collagen Vs. Poly-L-lysine Vs. Gelatin Coated coverslips (NSC34 cells)</title>
		<link>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/29302-type-i-collagen-vs-poly-l-lysine-vs-gelatin-coated-coverslips-nsc34-cells/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<span style='color: #000000'><span style='font-family: Helvetica'><span style='font-size: 8px;'>I just had a quick question about culture substrates. </span></span></span><br />
<br />
<span style='font-family: Helvetica'><span style='font-size: 12px;'><span style='color: #000000'>My supervisor wants quantitative confirmation that my cells are doing better on poly-L or collagen than gelatine before he coughs up $284 for pure type I rat tail collagen (from Sigma) as he does not have the funds. I wanted to know whether or not that was possible? By that I mean, I'm not sure whether that sort of data would be quantitative (e.g. cell density) or qualitative (cell adherence) because NSC34s will happily proliferate whether or not they are properly adhered to the surface (they are a reasonably aggressive proliferating cell line). </span></span></span><br />
<br />
<span style='color: #000000'><span style='font-family: Helvetica'><span style='font-size: 8px;'>Please let me know what you think. Is it more of a qualitative or quantitative measure? </span></span></span><br />
<br />
<span style='color: #000000'><span style='font-family: Helvetica'><span style='font-size: 8px;'>And which substrate would be best? Gelatin (which I've heard dissolves in modern day media over a period of 1 week) or collagen (at 0.01%) or poly-L (</span></span></span><span style='color: #000000'><span style='font-family: Helvetica'><span style='font-size: 8px;'>at 0.01%</span></span></span><span style='color: #000000'><span style='font-family: Helvetica'><span style='font-size: 8px;'>)?</span></span></span><br />
<br />
<span style='color: #000000'><span style='font-family: Helvetica'><span style='font-size: 8px;'>Many thanks!</span></span></span>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 04:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/29302-type-i-collagen-vs-poly-l-lysine-vs-gelatin-coated-coverslips-nsc34-cells/</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Deactivation of bacteria for competition study</title>
		<link>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/29301-deactivation-of-bacteria-for-competition-study/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi all, I'm a new user in this forum and register specifically to ask this question;<br />
<br />
I'm doing fungal fermentation. Every now and then I do have some contamination but it wasn't serious. I didn't use any antibiotics as my fungus is usually strong enough to overcome the contamination (I do practice sterile techniques)<br />
<br />
I've been only analysing the one metabolite produce by the fungus (metabolite A). Only recently I was able to analyse another metabolite that was said to increase as metabolite A increases (metabolite B )<br />
<br />
I was surprise to see how random the production would be compared to metabolite A. After some time, I suspect metabolite B was being produced as a response to the contamination, hence that is why the production is so random even within the same replicates (while metabolite A was so stable in production)<br />
<br />
I already cultured the contaminating bacteria. I'm thinking of introduce them into my fungus culture in 2 different conditions - live and deactivated (like vaccine). Does anyone in this forum has experience in deactivating bacteria for this kind of study? I afraid heat would change the conformation and chemical would be too poisonous to my fungal culture.]]></description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 01:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/29301-deactivation-of-bacteria-for-competition-study/</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>How to prepare serial dilutions of RNA or cDNA</title>
		<link>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/29300-how-to-prepare-serial-dilutions-of-rna-or-cdna/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[For making standard curve using real-time PCR, how to prepare 10-fold serial dilutions of RNA and cDNA? I tapped tube 200 times to make sure that the sample has been mixed very well. Then my standard curve is not with a good slope. For each dilution, the amplification curve is very beautiful. Then, I guess the problem is from dilutions. Are there some other points that can affect amplification?<div id='attach_wrap' class='clearfix'>
	<h4>Attached Thumbnails</h4>
	<ul>
		
			<li class=''>
				<a class='resized_img' rel='lightbox[155147]' id='ipb-attach-url-4721-0-47522900-1368998580' href="http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/index.php?app=core&module=attach&section=attach&attach_rel_module=post&attach_id=4721" title="Amplification Plot.jpg - Size: 67.73K, Downloads: 3"><img itemprop="image" src="http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/uploads/monthly_05_2013/post-33009-0-09432800-1368737459_thumb.jpg" id='ipb-attach-img-4721-0-47522900-1368998580' style='width:100;height:63' class='attach' width="100" height="63" alt="Amplification Plot.jpg" /></a>

			</li>
		
	</ul>
</div>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 20:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/29300-how-to-prepare-serial-dilutions-of-rna-or-cdna/</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>RNA extraction by trizol</title>
		<link>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/29299-rna-extraction-by-trizol/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey guyz,<br />
If someone is doing RNA extraction by Trizol method Can the the protein pellet that is obtained be used for expression analysis or this method waste the cellular proteins. I wanted the protein pellet for doing SDSPAGE and 2D<br />
<br />
Regards,<br />
Roshan]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 20:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/29299-rna-extraction-by-trizol/</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Problems in expression of target protein in E. coli</title>
		<link>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/29298-problems-in-expression-of-target-protein-in-e-coli/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi everyone.<br />
I'm facing a problem in expressing my target protein by using BLR(DE3) E. coli&nbsp;&nbsp;for months so your comments would be very valuable for me. <br />
More than 3 years ago, I have constructed a plasmid using pET22b(+) host strain and stored in glycerol stock at -80 C conditions. The expression of my target protein had been well until last year when it began significantly decreasing in yield (like less than 10 times compared to before with the same protocol). Gradually in later expressions, I didn't get the band of the target protein when running SDS-PAGE. Seemed like E. coli expressed a different kind of protein due to it migrated at different location.<br />
My target protein's molecular weight is 14 kDa and the unwanted protein is about 16 kDa.<br />
<br />
So, I transformed previously constructed plasmids into BLR(DE3). And the results were the same. Strangely, the band has similar molecular weight with the unwanted protein above. I mean its molecular weight is 16 kDa. <br />
<br />
And I constructed again a new plasmid, tested by sequencing to make sure everything is OK, transformed into a newly bought BLR(DE3) and it happened the same. <br />
<br />
Btw,&nbsp;&nbsp;I'm using TB solution containing extra proline for nutrients. My target protein is highly hydrophobic, contains many repetitive sequences and a His-tag at the C-terminus. I purified by using Ni-NTA resin. After purification, it always contains an impurities which molecular weight is about 31 kDa besides the target. However, these impurities precipitate during dialysis and easily removed. Recently, amount of the impurities increase and hard to precipitate so this is also another problem.<br />
<br />
I didn't get what is wrong here? I guess the problem is not on the E.coli but the expression media? Or sth contaminant?<br />
Anyone knows this situation before? <br />
I'm looking forward to your advice.<br />
Sorry for my bad English and Thank you very much (from Japan)<br />
<br />
P/s: I just use E.coli to express the target protein so I have very little background on this field (protein expression)]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 17:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.protocol-online.org/forums/topic/29298-problems-in-expression-of-target-protein-in-e-coli/</guid>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>