Categories See All
Search Articles
Recent Articles
Recent Comments
-
How to avoid foaming during...
By michaelddorsey, Feb 18 2019 05:49 AM -
How to find promoter sequen...
By Kikogarcia, Nov 15 2018 01:29 AM -
Issues Might Meet in the Pr...
By Ashlay Donlad, Jun 30 2016 05:39 AM -
Can 18s gene be used as ref...
By Ashlay Donlad, Mar 28 2016 06:47 AM -
How to find promoter sequen...
By Ashlay Donlad, Feb 05 2016 05:57 AM -
Sonication Vs MNase for ChI...
By Ashlay Donlad, Feb 05 2016 05:13 AM

Can 18s gene be used as reference gene for RT-PCR?
Hi, I have done few real time PCR works recently, and I used the 18s gene for endogeneous control.
Its Ct value was approximately 11 for every cDNAs used as template.
Here, I have a question.
Since 18s gene doesn't have poly A tail, it can't be amplified with oligo dT.
and cDNAs I used were synthesized using oligo dT, I wonder how 18s gene can be amplified with its Ct value approximately 11.
Thank you, all.
It is a DNA contamination.
18s is not a good reference gene, because:
1) It has multiple copies in genome. 300 to 400 copies, thus they are much more abundant than target mRNA transcripts, which are usually rare. Thus:
2) You have to dilute sample for 18s as 1:6000 while you dilute sample for other gene 1:20 to bing its CT value between 20-30. Thus:
3) 18s is diluted much more than that of other genes, so it has less inhibitors because of more dilution.
4) It has pseudogenes.
https://www.roche-ap...notes/lc_15.pdf
Check it yourself: goto Primer-Blast website and past both forward and reverse primers in that website and click "Get Primers" buttom.
https://www.ncbi.nlm...s/primer-blast/
You will see that it is not possible to design a pair of primers for 18s that do not bind to more than one place.
5) Ribosomal RNA is resistant to degradation much more than mRNA.
Thus use Ribosomal RNA instead of 18s.
http://openwetware.o...R_normalisation
and my suggestion based on my experience:
If you can not find a gene (except 18s )with stable CT value in order to use it as a reference gene, it is your fault.
Because 100% I am sure that you have not done RT, RNA normalization and sampling very well.
-----
Babak
1 Comments
About what was looking for, thanks for the help